Seems to me that gerrymandering means both political parties are taking voters for granted. That's why I'm a registered Independent. Regardless, just because you registered as a Republican or a Democrat does not mean that that's way you have to vote in a General Election. If you don't like your choices in a Primary, re-register then switch back, or don't vote at all, but do vote in the General Election - That's where it counts! Or am I just being too simple and/or onry?
Seems to me that gerrymandering means both political parties are taking voters for granted. That's why I'm a registered Independent. Regardless, just because you registered as a Republican or a Democrat does not mean that that's way you have to vote in a General Election. If you don't like your choices in a Primary, re-register then switch back, or don't vote at all, but do vote in the General Election - That's where it counts! Or am I just being too simple and/or onry?
I'm wondering why the court doesn't find Gerrymandering as resulting in race discrimination and therefore illegal.
Simply put it's just not truly a representative form .. which is what we are supposed to be after